On the
day of
, 20
there and then personally appeared ___________ and
_________ who being duly sworn, depose and say: that they witnessed the execution of the
within Last Will and Testament of the within named Testator/trix__________; that said
Testator/trix subscribed said Last Will and Testament and declared the same to be his/her Last
Will and Testament in their presence, and that they thereafter subscribed the same as
witnesses in the presence of said Testator/trix, and in the presence of each other, and at the
request of said Testator/trix; that said Testator/trix at the time of the execution of said Last Will
and Testament appeared to them to be of full age, of sound mind and memory.
residing at
123 Oak St., Las Vegas, NV
residing at
123 Maple St., Las Vegas, NV
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this
day of
, 20
.
Notary Public for said county and state [Person J’s notary stamp is here]
Here are the first two problems that immediately jumped out:
First, most of the property of the person who wrote this will was not mentioned in
the will. Who gets that property? Typically a will might list particular items to go to
particular people and then the will says how everything else shall be divided. This will does
not. At best, this will only disposes of the two vehicles and the two bank accounts. The
remaining property goes to various relative according to the Nevada statutes that describe
which relatives inherit if there is no will.
Second, did you notice that the will writer (the Testator) dated his will as August 6,
2009. The sloppy public notary first filled in August 6, 2009 on his notarization form, did
not fill in the names of the witnesses, and then dated his notarization as August 4, 2009.
With the notarization questionable the stage was now set for a battle between the
persons named in the will and the relatives who would inherit under state law if the will
were deemed invalid. In addition, the two bank accounts contained very unequal amounts
of money and the person getting the smaller account focused on the language that the four
persons named in the will were to get equal shares. Of course, the person getting the larger
bank account focused on the specific gift.
Fortunately, none of the people named in the will died before the Testator. If one of
them had, this will in one part of Item II says that the portion of the predeceased
beneficiary goes that person’s “issue” (children and grandchildren, etc.) while the
immediately following sentence says that person’s share goes to Person F.